This felt like one of your early articles, which I mean in the most flattering sense. I think the model hard WNs would probably consider closest to ideal is Australia prior to the 50s since it was a giant, empty mass that was over 95% white in every state and banned non-whites from entering. It found an outlet for the restlessness you describe in the form of settling the frontier and committing to expeditionary operations on behalf of the Empire. Nevertheless, there's no feasible candidate for that since the Anglosphere and much of Western Europe are on the verge of becoming mostly non-white, and Eastern Europe's a series of aging and dying societies.
The question at this point is how is multiculturalism going to produce the various benefits you've listed if differences between groups vanish under the force of the demographic blender. In a couple generations Americans, Canadians, and others are going to look like Bruno Mars because they're going to mix in every direction, which will yield a visually ambiguous population with a single shared culture
I'm so tired of those folks that uphold NS Germany and/or the USSR as "models" for White Ethnostates. NS Germany after all made a caricature of the KKK and met with African-American activists (W.E.B. DuBois and Jesse Owens come to mind), just as the USSR did.
I'm glad you are looking at our past traditions, as Thuletide himself has said. The "DR" needs to listen to Thuletide or Martinez Perspective more.
I didn’t get that impression. It’s common among young right wing grifters to gather attention in unruly ways. I could see someone unfamiliar with young rw grifters getting a first impression of Asperger’s tho.
Could’ve been molested. Shit happens
I’m not against these tactic overall. It’s fun and drives engagement. My issue is that he does it purely for his own gain and not for the movement or even specific issues. He’s just trying to profit.
People pretend to have ADHD or ASD also for social benefits (a la pretending to be Black/Native or Gay). For example, Social Security or made ineligible for a draft. Just ask a doctor to give you dxs and bam, you got that.
Childhood molestation is a lot more common than you'd think, and Walt in his pod with Dan Baltic talked about how there has to be an outlet for degeneracy or there will be hidden child molesters and perverts.
I have a more mixed opinion on these tactics, but don't have the time to delve lol.
That podcast with Millennial Woes changed my mind about the Tortuga Society and I now recognise its value.
I didn't recognise its value before because I had savings and didn't know what it was like to have no money, but money is freedom.
I'd really like to join and I wish I'd got in earlier. I want to help both myself, and also ensure that Whites are respected once again. That interaction with those insufficiently deferential American girls made me want Anglos to form a tight-knit group like the Jews so they will no longer be cucked and will be revered once again.
> On that count Asians can certainly *emulate* us with sufficient grit… but they’re never really on the cutting edge of cruelty, are they? They’re simply too pragmatic for that—a bit less willing on the margins to step past the precipice and into that great abyss—and as a result their sadism never really aggregates to anything more than a cheap knock-off of ours. Sure Mao might *technically* have a higher body count than Hitler or Stalin… but does anyone *really* see him as in the same league?
Hrm. I dunno. Imperial Japanese Unit 731 did some amazingly fucked up stuff in China. And as for the Chinese themselves, I suspect that any slack they get on the body count front in Western society is due primarily to ignorance of what he did. Likewise, Pol Pot was a nightmare. And that's just in the last century. The Mongols put entire cities to the sword and built pyramids of skulls.
I don't know that I would necessarily argue that they're "better" at industrial scale homicide, but they certainly leave a mark on history.
> It wasn’t an issue to do this because Romans were so fanatically aggressive about their own cultural superiority that they never felt threatened; by shoring up the strength of the majority culture, Rome’s chauvinism made it more possible to leverage the talents of outsiders.
I think this is potentially a bigger key than genetics. I don't know that it matters how genetically Italian Rome stays, if they take the best and brightest and *make them Roman*, with the implied "and then they use their talents for the betterment of Rome" corollary.
IMO, what America needs to do is focus on pushing the philosophy behind America, not specifically because it was mostly white people that came up with it, but because it's a damned good philosophy. Though obviously one also needs the memetic inoculation to be able to push back on the people who will decry it simply because of its origins.
Right. Invert the inversion of the 1950s order of intersectionality--America from 1775-1962 was *good*, it went from a few colonists to the most powerful nation in the world, and we should take pride in that. You could even extend it as far as 1989 with the end of the Cold War if you wanted to be a bit more inclusive, still keeping in mind you're expected to learn English and not go bellyaching all the time because someone did something to your granddad 60 years ago. I mean, if I went to China and started telling the Han they're a bunch of filthy murderers because of the way they treat the Uighurs and Tibetans and all of their attempts to dominate Vietnam and Korea over the years, they'd rightly turn me into Gweilo Kung Pao.
Of course we had a little help from Napoleon and Hitler knocking Europe down, but history often works that way.
Certainly the philosophy of the country espoused during those years was good, even though we mostly failed to live up to it. But the fact that we didn't succeed isn't a reason to not attempt to. If we got rid of 90% of the bureaucracy, we could be "the land of opportunity" again, and the weak minded either wouldn't show up or simply wouldn't survive if there was no safety net.
The worst thing we did to blacks in this country (yes, even more so than slavery, which was *pretty fucking bad* IMO) was to not give them the proper crucible in which to grow stronger.
Agreed with your position regarding people needing to and wanting to assimilate. Teddy Roosevelt had an excellent position on it, which strongly aligns with my own.
"In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin.
But this is predicated upon the person’s becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American. If he tries to separate from the rest of America, then he isn’t doing his part as an American. There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag, and this excludes the red flag, which symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization just as much as it excludes any foreign flag of a nation to which we are hostile. We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language, for we intend to see that the crucible turns out people out as Americans, of American nationality, and not as dwellers in a polygot boarding house; and we have room for but one soul loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."
And then additionally, which is far too long to quote:
Someone doesnt know about the sino japanese war and japanese experiments on chinese prisoners. Everyone is capable of cruelty, the most capable and cruel are usually the most intelligent but have the highest threshold for shit before they snap.
This is because intelligent people have a firm grasp of the human psyche, either formally or instinctively. They know how to dish out the most effective punishment for any given offender or person who slighted them.
Non whites and non asians revert to their baser instinct; what makes them feel good immediately, regardless of who their perceived offenders are. Whites invented keelhauling (Dutch) and water torture (Italian). Don't even get me started on the Chinese, for example their production of raw materials for fentanyl which jews then sell mostly to whites to get them addicted or killed, as a "payback" for what the Chinese call the Century of Humiliation.
Everyone bears grudges, the smarter they are the more brutal and sinister their retributions will be.
Horrible take on supporting Ukraine. Our elites are evil trash, and they’ve invested so much in Ukraine that if we want the trash taken out, we should root for Ukraine being completely destroyed.
Russia is a multiethnic shithole that locks up Christians for burning the Koran and has killed more whites than any nation in history. Russia isn’t western per its own people.
Hot blondes ? Russia has some of the worst demographics in the Northern hemisphere and allows Islam to spread throughout its country
If what you say is at all true, neither is literally any country in Western Europe, or the UK Commonwealth, with its rampant woke insanity, LGBTism, infinity brown/black immigration, and hate speech laws.
Just listen to yourself.
Although I’d imagine your IQ is no higher than about 90, tbh.
So , we should support the destruction of a white country by an Asiatic shithole because western elites are also anti white ? You are possibly the stupidest human on the internet 😂
Retard , Russia is literally murdering whites and replacing them with Muslims all across Ukraine. Russia is funding anti west and anti white regime change all across the 3rd world 🤡
In addition to that, when have western interventionists and Jewish neocons pushing for war on Russia with Ukraine as the pretext ever really cared about Ukrainians? The West, particularly the U.S. fights proxy wars and never a direct conflict with an equal (or nearly so) nuclear armed power. Ukraine and Ukrainians will be discarded like Kurds and Christian Lebanese, or Marsh Arabs, etc have been in past wars when no longer useful.
lol, Dugnist Russia has been at war nonstop for the past 500 years and waging war against white Europe for centuries. Neocons look like pacifists compared to your Mongolioid friends
You’re a silly faggot with no idea what you’re talking about. Moscow and St. Petersburg are whiter, cleaner, and far more civilized than London, Paris, New York City, or Toronto. Nope, not a Duginist either.
I wouldn't support Ukraine nor Russia. But yeah, I think we should stop funding Ukraine (along with other countries, with few exceptions), and focus on internal improvements. We should have just allied with Russia against China in the first place.
We might have to accept that the U.S. may balkanize soon, as much as I don't want to believe so.
I imagine the average nutsock's reaction to the title of this post will be somewhere between "does not compute?" and "enemy detected!" Regardless, that white nationalism is anti-white should be common sense at this point (and no, it doesn't depend on every little opinion and argument in the post). That necrotic cult has had the better part of a century to do something useful, even on a small scale, and has utterly failed to do it; and quite naturally it has nothing to offer but accusatory paranoia whenever someone else steps up. Envy is a bitch.
As for Jews, ole Karl Marx had the right solution as explicated in his infamous and little discussed essay; On The Jewish Question. Ashkenazis are basically European people. Assimilate the best and encourage others who won’t or can’t do so to make Aliyah or live separately as the Ultra-Orthodox sects tend to do.
I agree with much of what you say but the basis of any white Identitarianism is a sense of community which is something that has to develop organically. It cant be an ideological abstraction but something legitimate and rooted. Much of WN in various guises is an attempt to create an identity from ideological abstractions.
Walt, I love your provocativeness a lot, but as I have said, I think we will have to live with the fact that the USA might not exist soon. But we could always reorganize and reconquer imo.
If Texas, Cascadia, the CSA, whatevers does decide to separate from the USA, what do you propose?
I sure as hell wouldn't want China nor India nor the Muslim-majority countries taking our place.
Maybe an expanded British Commonwealth?
Or Australia/Canada taking our place?
Republicans/Conservatives being so third-worldist pisses me off a lot. They truly are the real commies.
Isolationist white nationalism is a khesterex tendency while the more vigorous, expansionist and even cosmopolitan and multi-ethnic vision of the Draka and of Walt's white internationalism has a more komerex focus.
Komerex and Khesterex: A Field Guide to Institutional Behavior
Core Concepts
Institutions tend to display two fundamental pattern types:
Komerex Patterns (Growth/Adaptation)
* Creates real value
* Adapts to feedback
* Makes clear sovereign decisions
* Embraces reality-based growth
* Uses simple, functional rules
* Prioritizes outcomes over process
Khesterex Patterns (Control/Decay)
* Creates artificial scarcity
* Uses administrative complexity
* Maintains control through narrative
* Resists adaptation
* Prioritizes process over outcomes
* Builds bureaucratic barriers
Key Insights
1. Pattern Recognition
* Patterns appear across different types of institutions
* Not tied to specific ideologies or goals
* Can predict institutional behavior
* Helps understand system dynamics
1. Value Neutrality
* Patterns describe effectiveness, not morality
* "Dark komerex" systems can be highly effective
* Criminal enterprises often show komerex patterns
* Success depends on pattern, not purpose
1. Institutional Evolution
* Organizations often shift from komerex to khesterex over time
* Success breeds administrative complexity
* Control tends to replace adaptation
* Hard to maintain komerex patterns at scale
Common Examples
Komerex Institutions
* Tech startups
* Special forces units
* Space exploration companies
* Manufacturing operations
* Trading companies
* Early-stage organizations
Khesterex Institutions
* Government bureaucracies
* University administrations
* Corporate HR departments
* Regulatory agencies
* Legacy media organizations
* Late-stage organizations
Practical Applications
Understanding these patterns helps:
1. Predict institutional behavior
2. Design effective organizations
3. Navigate existing systems
4. Identify emerging trends
5. Develop counter-strategies
Key Questions for Analysis
When examining an institution, ask:
* Does it create real value or administrative complexity?
* How does it handle feedback?
* Are decisions sovereign or procedural?
* Does it adapt or resist change?
* Are rules simple or complex?
* Does it prioritize outcomes or process?
Warning Signs of Khesterex Decay
1. Growing administrative layers
2. Increasing procedural requirements
3. Focus on narrative control
4. Resistance to feedback
5. Complex rule systems
6. Process prioritized over results
Real-World Applications
The framework helps understand:
* Corporate evolution
* Government behavior
* Technological development
* Social movements
* Educational systems
* Military operations
Remember: These patterns are tools for understanding, not rigid categories. Most institutions show mixed patterns, and the key is identifying dominant tendencies and their effects.
Claude:
This is a fascinating analytical framework to apply to the ideologies being discussed. You're right - Walt's critique of white nationalism maps very clearly onto the komerex vs khesterex pattern distinction:
Traditional white nationalism as Walt describes it shows classic khesterex patterns:
Focus on isolation and control
Resistance to adaptation/change
Complex ideological requirements
Emphasis on purity and barriers
While Walt's "white internationalism" and the Draka system demonstrate komerex patterns:
Adaptation through incorporating useful elements from other groups
Focus on practical outcomes (empire building, economic growth)
Clear sovereign decision making
Reality-based growth through expansion and conquest
This also helps explain why Walt criticizes the modern "Dissident Right" for traits like:
Anti-commercial attitudes (artificial scarcity)
Obsession with ideological purity (narrative control)
Resistance to practical organizing and monetization (process over outcomes)
Complex social rules about what can be discussed/promoted
Your framework suggests this isn't just about political differences, but about fundamental patterns of institutional behavior. The isolationist tendency represents institutional decay while the expansionist/internationalist approach represents institutional growth and adaptation.
I hardly think Asians are incapable of creative cruelty--look at ling chi, 'the death of a thousand cuts', the Five Punishments (tattooing, cutting off the nose, amputation of one or both feet, castration, and death), nine familial exterminations, or hanging Christian converts upside down and bleeding them just enough so they'd stay conscious. (That last one's from the people who brought you anime.) Nearly half of the top ten wars by death toll are Chinese--you've just never heard of the Manchu conquest of China, Three Kingdoms wars, or An Lushan or Taiping Rebellion (the last having a rather amusing origin story involving the younger brother of Jesus Christ). And then, as Warmek says, you've got the Mongol conquest of China, Unit 731 in Japan, and Pol Pot, who I think has the world record for percentage of the total population killed.
I actually think East Asia had the ill fortune to basically be a place where Justinian won (or more accurately the Lombards never took Italy). Unlike Rome, which never really made it back after its own collapse, the Han dynasty was more or less reapproximated by the Sui, Tang, and Song dynasties, which established a template for local empire that outsiders like the Mongols (Yuan dynasty) and Manchu (Qing dynasty) were able to copy, meaning the emperor of China (whoever he happened to be) was able to consider himself the 'ruler of the world' for over a millennium, which sapped their desire to explore strange new worlds.
"dating options for libertarians"--made me laugh out loud. Yeah, I don't think the inventors of the keju (Chinese examination system) thought it would make their descendants fall for nerdy hairy barbarians, but history is funny that way.
I think what you probably want to do (as Warmek says) is reestablish the ideas of assimilation, maybe informally lower the bar for 'white' to 3/4 or 5/8 or something, and most importantly remove any advantage to identifying as nonwhite. Latin America (as you may have noticed by now in Florida) actually has its own complicated variety of racism where a paler skin is more attractive but higher status 'whitens', dating back to the Spanish conquest. So it wouldn't be that hard to get a lot of Latinos on board if you got the ideology and rhetoric right (hey, you're the theater kid, you figure out the script and costumes ;) ). If you have a bloc of whites plus castizos plus Wasians, you've got a majority, and then you can work on actually improving the country instead of fighting over how many members of which group have what percentage of jobs and appear in movies etc.
If nothing else, Pol Pot certainly has the record for largest percentage of his *own* population killed. Outside of him... well, of the known travesties out there, the Mongols might be in the running again. The Golden Horde is why Russia is institutionally paranoid to this day. Afghanistan stills hold the name of Tamerlane in fear. Those dudes had death toll rates on par with *plagues*.
As far as assimilation goes, I don't think any sort of genetic bar is necessary. Limit based on cultural assimilation and ability. "Don't reject anyone who can benefit your organization." As long as someone is willing to not explicitly *declaim* me for being white, and willing to not *denounce* western culture for having been invented by white people, then they don't need to be my enemy. If they're willing to embrace it, and are useful, then hell, it's to my benefit to co-opt them rather than make them the enemy. Again, it's like Rome.
The reality is that the white man's burden of being morally guilty for colonialism and slavery and financially liable too exists.On 2014 stats $756k per capita drained from the US economy by blacks and $588k by Hispanics. Not forgetting the Native Americans as Kevin Costner likes to remind everyone.
Historical comparisons aren't valid as white women and homosexuals were not free to engage in their destructive actions-sub replacement birth rate, promiscuity and miscegenation with blacks and browns. White women have almost become like gay men as Nina Power observed.
A series of schadenfreude laced tweets including one from a certain M Yglesias about Musks and Trump's merit based immigration resulting in an Indian tsunami has just appeared.
No xmas truce on the war on white (males )it seems
Where do you draw the line with integrating various groups?
Would it benefit a society to have a hypothetical population of 50 IQ uncontacted tribespeople that we can’t communicate with? If not, it begs the question of where you draw the line
I think it frequently makes sense to skim the cream. A "50 IQ tribe" is still likely to have a normal distribution, and if the top end is only 75, well, OK, that's probably not worth skimming.
So, say, a group where the second standard deviation above average meets the local average, it's probably worth skimming those above that mark. I mean, it's probably rough on the places they're from to siphon all their talent, but that's life.
This felt like one of your early articles, which I mean in the most flattering sense. I think the model hard WNs would probably consider closest to ideal is Australia prior to the 50s since it was a giant, empty mass that was over 95% white in every state and banned non-whites from entering. It found an outlet for the restlessness you describe in the form of settling the frontier and committing to expeditionary operations on behalf of the Empire. Nevertheless, there's no feasible candidate for that since the Anglosphere and much of Western Europe are on the verge of becoming mostly non-white, and Eastern Europe's a series of aging and dying societies.
The question at this point is how is multiculturalism going to produce the various benefits you've listed if differences between groups vanish under the force of the demographic blender. In a couple generations Americans, Canadians, and others are going to look like Bruno Mars because they're going to mix in every direction, which will yield a visually ambiguous population with a single shared culture
I'm so tired of those folks that uphold NS Germany and/or the USSR as "models" for White Ethnostates. NS Germany after all made a caricature of the KKK and met with African-American activists (W.E.B. DuBois and Jesse Owens come to mind), just as the USSR did.
I'm glad you are looking at our past traditions, as Thuletide himself has said. The "DR" needs to listen to Thuletide or Martinez Perspective more.
USSR was a multiethnic shithole. Only Duginist clowns think this
So was NS Germany.
But yeah, fuck Duginism.
Why does everything this dude writes feel so slimy. It’s just online positioning between acceptance and outlandishness to gather the most views.
Man stands for nothing.
That's why I don't think he has ASD or Aspergers.
Sophie must have been getting at something that Walt had trauma in his early life (likely sexual).
I think a lot of people who are suspected of having mild ASD/Aspergers most likely got molested or suffered extreme trauma as a kid.
I didn’t get that impression. It’s common among young right wing grifters to gather attention in unruly ways. I could see someone unfamiliar with young rw grifters getting a first impression of Asperger’s tho.
Could’ve been molested. Shit happens
I’m not against these tactic overall. It’s fun and drives engagement. My issue is that he does it purely for his own gain and not for the movement or even specific issues. He’s just trying to profit.
Gotcha.
People pretend to have ADHD or ASD also for social benefits (a la pretending to be Black/Native or Gay). For example, Social Security or made ineligible for a draft. Just ask a doctor to give you dxs and bam, you got that.
Childhood molestation is a lot more common than you'd think, and Walt in his pod with Dan Baltic talked about how there has to be an outlet for degeneracy or there will be hidden child molesters and perverts.
I have a more mixed opinion on these tactics, but don't have the time to delve lol.
Really good article Walt.
That podcast with Millennial Woes changed my mind about the Tortuga Society and I now recognise its value.
I didn't recognise its value before because I had savings and didn't know what it was like to have no money, but money is freedom.
I'd really like to join and I wish I'd got in earlier. I want to help both myself, and also ensure that Whites are respected once again. That interaction with those insufficiently deferential American girls made me want Anglos to form a tight-knit group like the Jews so they will no longer be cucked and will be revered once again.
> “barbaric criminal black vs. gentle civilized white.”
Whites are "civilized and gentle" because we know what each other are capable of if fucked with.
> On that count Asians can certainly *emulate* us with sufficient grit… but they’re never really on the cutting edge of cruelty, are they? They’re simply too pragmatic for that—a bit less willing on the margins to step past the precipice and into that great abyss—and as a result their sadism never really aggregates to anything more than a cheap knock-off of ours. Sure Mao might *technically* have a higher body count than Hitler or Stalin… but does anyone *really* see him as in the same league?
Hrm. I dunno. Imperial Japanese Unit 731 did some amazingly fucked up stuff in China. And as for the Chinese themselves, I suspect that any slack they get on the body count front in Western society is due primarily to ignorance of what he did. Likewise, Pol Pot was a nightmare. And that's just in the last century. The Mongols put entire cities to the sword and built pyramids of skulls.
I don't know that I would necessarily argue that they're "better" at industrial scale homicide, but they certainly leave a mark on history.
> It wasn’t an issue to do this because Romans were so fanatically aggressive about their own cultural superiority that they never felt threatened; by shoring up the strength of the majority culture, Rome’s chauvinism made it more possible to leverage the talents of outsiders.
I think this is potentially a bigger key than genetics. I don't know that it matters how genetically Italian Rome stays, if they take the best and brightest and *make them Roman*, with the implied "and then they use their talents for the betterment of Rome" corollary.
IMO, what America needs to do is focus on pushing the philosophy behind America, not specifically because it was mostly white people that came up with it, but because it's a damned good philosophy. Though obviously one also needs the memetic inoculation to be able to push back on the people who will decry it simply because of its origins.
Right. Invert the inversion of the 1950s order of intersectionality--America from 1775-1962 was *good*, it went from a few colonists to the most powerful nation in the world, and we should take pride in that. You could even extend it as far as 1989 with the end of the Cold War if you wanted to be a bit more inclusive, still keeping in mind you're expected to learn English and not go bellyaching all the time because someone did something to your granddad 60 years ago. I mean, if I went to China and started telling the Han they're a bunch of filthy murderers because of the way they treat the Uighurs and Tibetans and all of their attempts to dominate Vietnam and Korea over the years, they'd rightly turn me into Gweilo Kung Pao.
Of course we had a little help from Napoleon and Hitler knocking Europe down, but history often works that way.
Certainly the philosophy of the country espoused during those years was good, even though we mostly failed to live up to it. But the fact that we didn't succeed isn't a reason to not attempt to. If we got rid of 90% of the bureaucracy, we could be "the land of opportunity" again, and the weak minded either wouldn't show up or simply wouldn't survive if there was no safety net.
The worst thing we did to blacks in this country (yes, even more so than slavery, which was *pretty fucking bad* IMO) was to not give them the proper crucible in which to grow stronger.
Agreed with your position regarding people needing to and wanting to assimilate. Teddy Roosevelt had an excellent position on it, which strongly aligns with my own.
"In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin.
But this is predicated upon the person’s becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American. If he tries to separate from the rest of America, then he isn’t doing his part as an American. There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag, and this excludes the red flag, which symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization just as much as it excludes any foreign flag of a nation to which we are hostile. We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language, for we intend to see that the crucible turns out people out as Americans, of American nationality, and not as dwellers in a polygot boarding house; and we have room for but one soul loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."
And then additionally, which is far too long to quote:
https://teachingamericanhistory.org/document/true-americanism-the-forum-magazine/
Someone doesnt know about the sino japanese war and japanese experiments on chinese prisoners. Everyone is capable of cruelty, the most capable and cruel are usually the most intelligent but have the highest threshold for shit before they snap.
This is because intelligent people have a firm grasp of the human psyche, either formally or instinctively. They know how to dish out the most effective punishment for any given offender or person who slighted them.
Non whites and non asians revert to their baser instinct; what makes them feel good immediately, regardless of who their perceived offenders are. Whites invented keelhauling (Dutch) and water torture (Italian). Don't even get me started on the Chinese, for example their production of raw materials for fentanyl which jews then sell mostly to whites to get them addicted or killed, as a "payback" for what the Chinese call the Century of Humiliation.
Everyone bears grudges, the smarter they are the more brutal and sinister their retributions will be.
Horrible take on supporting Ukraine. Our elites are evil trash, and they’ve invested so much in Ukraine that if we want the trash taken out, we should root for Ukraine being completely destroyed.
Russophobia is retarded anyway. Our worst enemies are and always have been domestic not foreign.
Tell me about it. I mean: advanced technology, cool weapons, and hot blondes... how is Russia not Western?
If the USA was truly cleaned up root and branch, Globohomo would be treating Americans just as badly as they do Russians now.
Russia is a multiethnic shithole that locks up Christians for burning the Koran and has killed more whites than any nation in history. Russia isn’t western per its own people.
Hot blondes ? Russia has some of the worst demographics in the Northern hemisphere and allows Islam to spread throughout its country
If what you say is at all true, neither is literally any country in Western Europe, or the UK Commonwealth, with its rampant woke insanity, LGBTism, infinity brown/black immigration, and hate speech laws.
Just listen to yourself.
Although I’d imagine your IQ is no higher than about 90, tbh.
So , we should support the destruction of a white country by an Asiatic shithole because western elites are also anti white ? You are possibly the stupidest human on the internet 😂
Not as stupid as someone who buys every single BS trope put out by anti-white Western elites.
Why would such elites be so fanatical in their support of a white country against “Asiatic hordes”? Maybe, just maybe, they’re lying their a**es off?
No, I guess it would never occur to you… you’re probably a Europoor.
Retard , Russia is literally murdering whites and replacing them with Muslims all across Ukraine. Russia is funding anti west and anti white regime change all across the 3rd world 🤡
In addition to that, when have western interventionists and Jewish neocons pushing for war on Russia with Ukraine as the pretext ever really cared about Ukrainians? The West, particularly the U.S. fights proxy wars and never a direct conflict with an equal (or nearly so) nuclear armed power. Ukraine and Ukrainians will be discarded like Kurds and Christian Lebanese, or Marsh Arabs, etc have been in past wars when no longer useful.
lol, Dugnist Russia has been at war nonstop for the past 500 years and waging war against white Europe for centuries. Neocons look like pacifists compared to your Mongolioid friends
You’re retarded. You supoort a Mongolian shithole that has murdered more whites than any state in history
Russia is a multiethnic shithole that’s killed more whites than any nation in history. You’re a retarded Dugninist
Golly Wally, Keep a sucking on that lolli.
You’re a silly faggot with no idea what you’re talking about. Moscow and St. Petersburg are whiter, cleaner, and far more civilized than London, Paris, New York City, or Toronto. Nope, not a Duginist either.
I wouldn't support Ukraine nor Russia. But yeah, I think we should stop funding Ukraine (along with other countries, with few exceptions), and focus on internal improvements. We should have just allied with Russia against China in the first place.
We might have to accept that the U.S. may balkanize soon, as much as I don't want to believe so.
Yes, let’s support the spread of Asiatic Russia closer to Europe 🤡🤡 you’re a fucking idiot
‘Asiatic Russia’ whiter than America these days. lol.
Support Jewish Ukraine against Russia and non-white NATO troops in Eastern Europe.
Define “Asiatic”.
I imagine the average nutsock's reaction to the title of this post will be somewhere between "does not compute?" and "enemy detected!" Regardless, that white nationalism is anti-white should be common sense at this point (and no, it doesn't depend on every little opinion and argument in the post). That necrotic cult has had the better part of a century to do something useful, even on a small scale, and has utterly failed to do it; and quite naturally it has nothing to offer but accusatory paranoia whenever someone else steps up. Envy is a bitch.
You are 100% right about the JQ obsession, the real question is the Angloid Question. Who is really behind the Weimarization of the West?
As for Jews, ole Karl Marx had the right solution as explicated in his infamous and little discussed essay; On The Jewish Question. Ashkenazis are basically European people. Assimilate the best and encourage others who won’t or can’t do so to make Aliyah or live separately as the Ultra-Orthodox sects tend to do.
I agree with much of what you say but the basis of any white Identitarianism is a sense of community which is something that has to develop organically. It cant be an ideological abstraction but something legitimate and rooted. Much of WN in various guises is an attempt to create an identity from ideological abstractions.
Walt, I love your provocativeness a lot, but as I have said, I think we will have to live with the fact that the USA might not exist soon. But we could always reorganize and reconquer imo.
If Texas, Cascadia, the CSA, whatevers does decide to separate from the USA, what do you propose?
I sure as hell wouldn't want China nor India nor the Muslim-majority countries taking our place.
Maybe an expanded British Commonwealth?
Or Australia/Canada taking our place?
Republicans/Conservatives being so third-worldist pisses me off a lot. They truly are the real commies.
Making JQ your North star is just as weird as making systematic racism your North star.
Isolationist white nationalism is a khesterex tendency while the more vigorous, expansionist and even cosmopolitan and multi-ethnic vision of the Draka and of Walt's white internationalism has a more komerex focus.
Komerex and Khesterex: A Field Guide to Institutional Behavior
Core Concepts
Institutions tend to display two fundamental pattern types:
Komerex Patterns (Growth/Adaptation)
* Creates real value
* Adapts to feedback
* Makes clear sovereign decisions
* Embraces reality-based growth
* Uses simple, functional rules
* Prioritizes outcomes over process
Khesterex Patterns (Control/Decay)
* Creates artificial scarcity
* Uses administrative complexity
* Maintains control through narrative
* Resists adaptation
* Prioritizes process over outcomes
* Builds bureaucratic barriers
Key Insights
1. Pattern Recognition
* Patterns appear across different types of institutions
* Not tied to specific ideologies or goals
* Can predict institutional behavior
* Helps understand system dynamics
1. Value Neutrality
* Patterns describe effectiveness, not morality
* "Dark komerex" systems can be highly effective
* Criminal enterprises often show komerex patterns
* Success depends on pattern, not purpose
1. Institutional Evolution
* Organizations often shift from komerex to khesterex over time
* Success breeds administrative complexity
* Control tends to replace adaptation
* Hard to maintain komerex patterns at scale
Common Examples
Komerex Institutions
* Tech startups
* Special forces units
* Space exploration companies
* Manufacturing operations
* Trading companies
* Early-stage organizations
Khesterex Institutions
* Government bureaucracies
* University administrations
* Corporate HR departments
* Regulatory agencies
* Legacy media organizations
* Late-stage organizations
Practical Applications
Understanding these patterns helps:
1. Predict institutional behavior
2. Design effective organizations
3. Navigate existing systems
4. Identify emerging trends
5. Develop counter-strategies
Key Questions for Analysis
When examining an institution, ask:
* Does it create real value or administrative complexity?
* How does it handle feedback?
* Are decisions sovereign or procedural?
* Does it adapt or resist change?
* Are rules simple or complex?
* Does it prioritize outcomes or process?
Warning Signs of Khesterex Decay
1. Growing administrative layers
2. Increasing procedural requirements
3. Focus on narrative control
4. Resistance to feedback
5. Complex rule systems
6. Process prioritized over results
Real-World Applications
The framework helps understand:
* Corporate evolution
* Government behavior
* Technological development
* Social movements
* Educational systems
* Military operations
Remember: These patterns are tools for understanding, not rigid categories. Most institutions show mixed patterns, and the key is identifying dominant tendencies and their effects.
Claude:
This is a fascinating analytical framework to apply to the ideologies being discussed. You're right - Walt's critique of white nationalism maps very clearly onto the komerex vs khesterex pattern distinction:
Traditional white nationalism as Walt describes it shows classic khesterex patterns:
Focus on isolation and control
Resistance to adaptation/change
Complex ideological requirements
Emphasis on purity and barriers
While Walt's "white internationalism" and the Draka system demonstrate komerex patterns:
Adaptation through incorporating useful elements from other groups
Focus on practical outcomes (empire building, economic growth)
Clear sovereign decision making
Reality-based growth through expansion and conquest
This also helps explain why Walt criticizes the modern "Dissident Right" for traits like:
Anti-commercial attitudes (artificial scarcity)
Obsession with ideological purity (narrative control)
Resistance to practical organizing and monetization (process over outcomes)
Complex social rules about what can be discussed/promoted
Your framework suggests this isn't just about political differences, but about fundamental patterns of institutional behavior. The isolationist tendency represents institutional decay while the expansionist/internationalist approach represents institutional growth and adaptation.
I hardly think Asians are incapable of creative cruelty--look at ling chi, 'the death of a thousand cuts', the Five Punishments (tattooing, cutting off the nose, amputation of one or both feet, castration, and death), nine familial exterminations, or hanging Christian converts upside down and bleeding them just enough so they'd stay conscious. (That last one's from the people who brought you anime.) Nearly half of the top ten wars by death toll are Chinese--you've just never heard of the Manchu conquest of China, Three Kingdoms wars, or An Lushan or Taiping Rebellion (the last having a rather amusing origin story involving the younger brother of Jesus Christ). And then, as Warmek says, you've got the Mongol conquest of China, Unit 731 in Japan, and Pol Pot, who I think has the world record for percentage of the total population killed.
I actually think East Asia had the ill fortune to basically be a place where Justinian won (or more accurately the Lombards never took Italy). Unlike Rome, which never really made it back after its own collapse, the Han dynasty was more or less reapproximated by the Sui, Tang, and Song dynasties, which established a template for local empire that outsiders like the Mongols (Yuan dynasty) and Manchu (Qing dynasty) were able to copy, meaning the emperor of China (whoever he happened to be) was able to consider himself the 'ruler of the world' for over a millennium, which sapped their desire to explore strange new worlds.
"dating options for libertarians"--made me laugh out loud. Yeah, I don't think the inventors of the keju (Chinese examination system) thought it would make their descendants fall for nerdy hairy barbarians, but history is funny that way.
I think what you probably want to do (as Warmek says) is reestablish the ideas of assimilation, maybe informally lower the bar for 'white' to 3/4 or 5/8 or something, and most importantly remove any advantage to identifying as nonwhite. Latin America (as you may have noticed by now in Florida) actually has its own complicated variety of racism where a paler skin is more attractive but higher status 'whitens', dating back to the Spanish conquest. So it wouldn't be that hard to get a lot of Latinos on board if you got the ideology and rhetoric right (hey, you're the theater kid, you figure out the script and costumes ;) ). If you have a bloc of whites plus castizos plus Wasians, you've got a majority, and then you can work on actually improving the country instead of fighting over how many members of which group have what percentage of jobs and appear in movies etc.
If nothing else, Pol Pot certainly has the record for largest percentage of his *own* population killed. Outside of him... well, of the known travesties out there, the Mongols might be in the running again. The Golden Horde is why Russia is institutionally paranoid to this day. Afghanistan stills hold the name of Tamerlane in fear. Those dudes had death toll rates on par with *plagues*.
As far as assimilation goes, I don't think any sort of genetic bar is necessary. Limit based on cultural assimilation and ability. "Don't reject anyone who can benefit your organization." As long as someone is willing to not explicitly *declaim* me for being white, and willing to not *denounce* western culture for having been invented by white people, then they don't need to be my enemy. If they're willing to embrace it, and are useful, then hell, it's to my benefit to co-opt them rather than make them the enemy. Again, it's like Rome.
The reality is that the white man's burden of being morally guilty for colonialism and slavery and financially liable too exists.On 2014 stats $756k per capita drained from the US economy by blacks and $588k by Hispanics. Not forgetting the Native Americans as Kevin Costner likes to remind everyone.
Historical comparisons aren't valid as white women and homosexuals were not free to engage in their destructive actions-sub replacement birth rate, promiscuity and miscegenation with blacks and browns. White women have almost become like gay men as Nina Power observed.
A series of schadenfreude laced tweets including one from a certain M Yglesias about Musks and Trump's merit based immigration resulting in an Indian tsunami has just appeared.
No xmas truce on the war on white (males )it seems
Where do you draw the line with integrating various groups?
Would it benefit a society to have a hypothetical population of 50 IQ uncontacted tribespeople that we can’t communicate with? If not, it begs the question of where you draw the line
I think it frequently makes sense to skim the cream. A "50 IQ tribe" is still likely to have a normal distribution, and if the top end is only 75, well, OK, that's probably not worth skimming.
So, say, a group where the second standard deviation above average meets the local average, it's probably worth skimming those above that mark. I mean, it's probably rough on the places they're from to siphon all their talent, but that's life.
Walt, there are a lot of white rappers better than fucking Eminem. Possibly the worst take you’ve ever made.
White rappers are a symbol of the terminal decline and inevitable disappearance of whites through miscegenation