Asians are the most brutal race on earth if you consider Genghis Khan. Then consider the Japanese in the Second World War. Asians are complete psychopaths in the eyes of white civilization. This doesn’t mean whites aren’t capable of brutality, but to try and claim the title seems like a cope for feeling inferior…
Asians are the most brutal race on earth if you consider Genghis Khan. Then consider the Japanese in the Second World War. Asians are complete psychopaths in the eyes of white civilization. This doesn’t mean whites aren’t capable of brutality, but to try and claim the title seems like a cope for feeling inferior…
I have to disagree that white nationalism is anti-white.
The picture you paint is white imperialism in place of white nationalism….with the idea that non-whites will take their place as second class citizens. Even if white people in the west suddenly decided to be supremacists again this recipe fails in the long run (because we started that way and wound up where we are today).
White nationalism is a morally superior position to hold because it does not seek to subjugate other peoples of the earth. It is a universalist position that all peoples deserve a homeland and easily defended from slurs of supremacism.
Sure, all nations have strengths that could be emulated by each other, but that is not a strong enough argument for resurgent white imperialism. It goes against the cornerstone of white interests, to secure the existence of white people and future for white children. There are far too many drawbacks associated with multiracial societies that we all know too well.
The empire you describe will be bound together with a totalitarian iron fist. It’s the only regime capable of holding together a multiracial, inegalitarian empire. This is antithetical to white interests. Maybe meds can get on board, but the Northwestern European will never be at home under an Emperor.
Asians are the most brutal race on earth if you consider Genghis Khan. Then consider the Japanese in the Second World War. Asians are complete psychopaths in the eyes of white civilization. This doesn’t mean whites aren’t capable of brutality, but to try and claim the title seems like a cope for feeling inferior…
I have to disagree that white nationalism is anti-white.
The picture you paint is white imperialism in place of white nationalism….with the idea that non-whites will take their place as second class citizens. Even if white people in the west suddenly decided to be supremacists again this recipe fails in the long run (because we started that way and wound up where we are today).
White nationalism is a morally superior position to hold because it does not seek to subjugate other peoples of the earth. It is a universalist position that all peoples deserve a homeland and easily defended from slurs of supremacism.
Sure, all nations have strengths that could be emulated by each other, but that is not a strong enough argument for resurgent white imperialism. It goes against the cornerstone of white interests, to secure the existence of white people and future for white children. There are far too many drawbacks associated with multiracial societies that we all know too well.
The empire you describe will be bound together with a totalitarian iron fist. It’s the only regime capable of holding together a multiracial, inegalitarian empire. This is antithetical to white interests. Maybe meds can get on board, but the Northwestern European will never be at home under an Emperor.