Epic. An alternative to no agency is that they just have different styles of desire.
This song explains why women are relentless consumers too; a love for the new. The tada new thing. Maybe the knight and maiden exist in parallel in terms of where they are in their desire maturity. He will want the newness of pursuing, and she will want the newness of being pursued. Neither wants to settle, settling would mean giving up the addiction that is courtship
The clear solution to lack of agency as a man is not to be a fucking simp right? Guys will unironically think that that is what they have to be like to the woman they love and inevitably end up with women that get off to men simping for them. Or they end up resentful about that fact that “women only love assholes”. How about have some dignity and self-respect? Love without simping? Is that too idealistic?
Not the obv undignified kind where she's just friendzoning you ofc, but the kind where it's a relationship or she lets you smash (or at least actively flirts back) is just an untrammeled joy.
And so misogyny stems mostly from male resentment that women don't enjoy it back.
The reason well-adjusted women don’t like simping is exactly because so many men enjoy the act of doing it more than the person they’re simping for. You’re as replaceable to the simp as the simp is to you. It’s like erecting a permanent “protective” wall that prevents any real engagement or relationship from forming. I understand why most men do it- sometime in early life a lot of them find out in very unpleasant ways that you can actually get hurt if you don’t put up a wall. But the way to not become a white knight is to come out from behind the wall at some point and risk getting hurt again,
Epic. An alternative to no agency is that they just have different styles of desire.
This song explains why women are relentless consumers too; a love for the new. The tada new thing. Maybe the knight and maiden exist in parallel in terms of where they are in their desire maturity. He will want the newness of pursuing, and she will want the newness of being pursued. Neither wants to settle, settling would mean giving up the addiction that is courtship
I think see the trve cavalier as wanting a woman who keeps givin him quests
but the logical endpoint of that tendency in women is to keep finding new knights
The clear solution to lack of agency as a man is not to be a fucking simp right? Guys will unironically think that that is what they have to be like to the woman they love and inevitably end up with women that get off to men simping for them. Or they end up resentful about that fact that “women only love assholes”. How about have some dignity and self-respect? Love without simping? Is that too idealistic?
The majority of men really enjoy simping!
Not the obv undignified kind where she's just friendzoning you ofc, but the kind where it's a relationship or she lets you smash (or at least actively flirts back) is just an untrammeled joy.
And so misogyny stems mostly from male resentment that women don't enjoy it back.
The reason well-adjusted women don’t like simping is exactly because so many men enjoy the act of doing it more than the person they’re simping for. You’re as replaceable to the simp as the simp is to you. It’s like erecting a permanent “protective” wall that prevents any real engagement or relationship from forming. I understand why most men do it- sometime in early life a lot of them find out in very unpleasant ways that you can actually get hurt if you don’t put up a wall. But the way to not become a white knight is to come out from behind the wall at some point and risk getting hurt again,
in my experience the best route is to mediate your simpiness in a way she finds hot
Like by becoming a Black Knight.
There you go, then. That’s a way out from behind the wall and it’s clearly effective by your own admission too.
Pretty gay conversation, but not at all retarded. Josh Slocum is a treasure.
real redpill is the more you're one the more you're the other