@9:48 Technically, it exists, but between mothers and sons. It’s called fetal microchimerism- Male fetal progenitor cells persist in maternal blood for as long as 27 years postpartum. In this way, a mother can carry her son's DNA for years or decades after pregnancy. The cells can be found in the mother's blood, bone marrow, skin, liver, and brain.
This kinda information is often intentionally misinterpreted, similar to the “body count” and bonding theory. The bonding hormones people always talking about are more relevant between mothers and their newborn babies after child birth, not necessarily sexual partners. So by their logic, a woman should expect to have a weaker relationship with her fifth baby, and therefore should only have one child. 😂 In reality, the youngest child is often the one that parents are most attached to. Secondly, that hormone is released during orgasm. As we all know, that’s not a forgone conclusion for women during sex, and you don’t need to have sex with anyone to have an orgasm.
A lot of this information is twisted up to support particular preferences that people have. I wish people would just be open about their desires and leave biology out of it.
Since someone brought up the comparison: Hanania doesn’t seem to be straight-up posting his personal fetishes. It’s more strategic. On Dollcast, he said he personally prefers ass, but his modal audience member prefers tits, so he will post the latter. His captions are also vague on purpose to bait dumb arguments for engagement.
Yeah, this was pretty illuminating. Holy Christ. Had to write an essay for a the restack; I'd really love for more people to hear this. If nothing else, it was very interesting, but you know... in a gossip magazine kind of way. Stay safe guys: putting this stuff out there is pretty bold -- let's see if the strategy pays off. Oof.
Oh, and Rob doesn't seem like he's too sexual in most of his recent articles. Very wholesome, possibly other than his usage of psychedelics (but even there).
This was the most apt thumbnail in history
@9:48 Technically, it exists, but between mothers and sons. It’s called fetal microchimerism- Male fetal progenitor cells persist in maternal blood for as long as 27 years postpartum. In this way, a mother can carry her son's DNA for years or decades after pregnancy. The cells can be found in the mother's blood, bone marrow, skin, liver, and brain.
This kinda information is often intentionally misinterpreted, similar to the “body count” and bonding theory. The bonding hormones people always talking about are more relevant between mothers and their newborn babies after child birth, not necessarily sexual partners. So by their logic, a woman should expect to have a weaker relationship with her fifth baby, and therefore should only have one child. 😂 In reality, the youngest child is often the one that parents are most attached to. Secondly, that hormone is released during orgasm. As we all know, that’s not a forgone conclusion for women during sex, and you don’t need to have sex with anyone to have an orgasm.
A lot of this information is twisted up to support particular preferences that people have. I wish people would just be open about their desires and leave biology out of it.
I’ve got to be suitably drunk to listen to this whole thing.
Great lyrics. You need to write a musical.
Since someone brought up the comparison: Hanania doesn’t seem to be straight-up posting his personal fetishes. It’s more strategic. On Dollcast, he said he personally prefers ass, but his modal audience member prefers tits, so he will post the latter. His captions are also vague on purpose to bait dumb arguments for engagement.
Yeah, this was pretty illuminating. Holy Christ. Had to write an essay for a the restack; I'd really love for more people to hear this. If nothing else, it was very interesting, but you know... in a gossip magazine kind of way. Stay safe guys: putting this stuff out there is pretty bold -- let's see if the strategy pays off. Oof.
I bet John Arcto has disgusting fetishes
Groundbreaking...
Loved the debate, and despite y'all saying otherwise, it WAS a debate, however constructive.
Y u guys no bring up more innocent fetishes, such as that of legs or arms
Growing up in AZ, engaged in locker room talk all the time in public and especially in middle school. It was quite common among pre-adults folks.
I don't think it's true that the West Coast is more sexually liberated than the East Coast. Recall the LDS, South Florida, and NYC.
I know that individual women could vote before universal suffrage came for Men or for other ethnic groups. They just had to own property to vote.
Oh, and Rob doesn't seem like he's too sexual in most of his recent articles. Very wholesome, possibly other than his usage of psychedelics (but even there).
You need to watch The Jolly Heretic's podcast on oral sex. He explains the biology of it all and why it's entirely natural and even necessary.
I have watched that video.
Link?