At whatever point you're looking to rebrand the movement, it's fairly crucial that you need to define the name rather than letting the detractors define it. It's probably a little early to actually try to do that, but keep that thought in mind for future endeavors.
The openness map that you use to illustrate your arguments reveals exactly what I had long suspected. North Woods residents (i.e. Duluth, Northern Wisconsin, Upper Peninsula) have their own identity and can not be considered true Midwesterners. When I relocated to this region of the country, it was clear that this was a considerably more Faustian environment. There are also several other obvious patches of openness in the Great Lakes States. Would you be interested in discussing this phenomenon further?
As a proper Jew (the beard, the hat...) I really enjoy your writing.
Not only are you right on most things, you are one of the few that offers any actionable steps that can improve the situation right now (Tortuga society), rather than endlessly bitching and wordcelling and waiting for things to magically turn around on day.
Even you grand vision of White Globalism is rooted in the system that already exist, and close to the 'normal' framework, and thus has some potential to work, unlike the dreams of secession and racial purity and mass expulsions.
If you even need Talmudic consultant (and can you really have a social revolution without it?), give me a call.
Great read, thanks for responding, and what a bountiful number of potential topics for us to explore in your kindly-offered debate! I'll work with you to set something up that will be engaging for our audiences.
"To assume such a program entails “Brownification” is again to proceed instinctively from the scarcity mindset—why wouldn’t it mean bleaching?"
Because there are far more non-white people in the world, and America's gen alpha's already mostly non-white. Consequently, mass miscegenation results in everyone looking like Bruno Mars or Nyjah Houston, and white becomes a term to refer to an ever dwindling minority
Many of us don’t identify with Right or Left. I like peasants and hobbits. Most of us here are such whether some like to admit it openly or not. I want what is good and healthy for them without smothering those with more exceptional qualities or intelligence.
It’s almost a case of “nobody’s wrong, you’re both right.” I think the main dividing line is a case of is/ought (Walt/Norm, respectively) or maybe a case of entryism and quotidian pragmatism (Walt) vs. adherence to principles to spur change through a paroxysm of action (Norm).
Spiritually and ideologically, I’d love to agree with Norm, but I think his approach is something to consider after things collapse.
Sorry, I'll have to disagree with the point about whites having a special penchant for creative brutality. This frankly seems like cope from the opposite direction — the way nerdy HBD-types like Sailer play up the trope of the "domesticated, civilized [subconsciously effete] white man" with appeal to low crime rates; the same way you and guys like BAP play up this angle of Aryan masculinist aggression. But neither is really true.
Yes Whites have indeed committed the greatest acts of organized violence in history ...as they also have the greatest humanitarian and internationalist acts (eradication of smallpox, abolition of slave trade, bringing modern medicine and Green Revolution innovations to Asia and Africa). That's simply a function of better industrial and technological capacities, of having begetted the industrial revolution and all of modernity — you're the first at everything. Indeed, when a non-Western power manages to master Western industry and science for their own ends we see comparably massive death tolls, like Imperial Japan's rampage through East and Southeast Asia: 25 million dead in just seven years. I won't even mention the Mongols, premodern at that (Maybe the Chinese are a bit more mercantile of course)
Even the unparalleled genocide of Native Americans - arguably the greatest conquest in history in terms of land gained, and conducted by a self-confident Europe during the spring of its virility, had more to do with the lack of immunity to Old World disease, rather than an excess of European brutality. When indigenous societies were only slightly more disease-resistant like the Maori, they managed to survive if diminished and relegated to minority status — and if anything these days we see a reversal of fortunes, seeing the haka performed as an anti-white humiliation ritual in New Zealand's parliament with absolute impunity, and to global (woke-media-consensus) approval.
And of course the rest of the Old World managed to survive as more-or-less civilizations with no substantial demographic replacement, although I'll grant that most are essentially failed states, and even the "BRICS" power-bloc isn't looking particularly vital. And while it's probable that America will successfully contain China[1], this will be done for the altar of Globalist Neoliberalism, _not_ Masculinist White Imperialism: the same such altar which also has white babies constantly suspended above the fiery pit of diversity and multiculturalism.
[1] Burst-Gorges-Dam scenarios are like to see America lose most of its major cities to Dongfengs too, especially since the Chinese of late have started to build up their nuclear arsenal in preparation for their Special Military Operation. (It wasn't always like this: China was diplomatically isolated for the entire 1960s and didn't have any missiles capable of reaching America or even Western Europe; and post-Split the Soviets might well have turned the other way if America wanted to do something a little pre-emptive. But adding to my thesis: of course it was Christian charity, not Aryan brutality, that in the end prevailed.)
If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle. -Sun Tzu
Therefore, a distilled version of the talmud is most efficacious.
Dissident right is a horrible name, but it sticks, unfortunately.
"New right" is good enough.
At whatever point you're looking to rebrand the movement, it's fairly crucial that you need to define the name rather than letting the detractors define it. It's probably a little early to actually try to do that, but keep that thought in mind for future endeavors.
The openness map that you use to illustrate your arguments reveals exactly what I had long suspected. North Woods residents (i.e. Duluth, Northern Wisconsin, Upper Peninsula) have their own identity and can not be considered true Midwesterners. When I relocated to this region of the country, it was clear that this was a considerably more Faustian environment. There are also several other obvious patches of openness in the Great Lakes States. Would you be interested in discussing this phenomenon further?
If you are curious about this, read more here:
https://swiftenterprises.substack.com/p/the-fordlands-and-the-cornlands
That article is excellent. I think this might actually be one of the most significant demographic maps of America.
The openness desert that is the northern tip of my home state of Maine is Aroostook County, which is pretty much one big potato farm.
One day I’ll find a hierarchy atop which my beloved cornlands sit.
Til then, go Big Red
That part of the "Midwest" is very Finnish or otherwise Nordic.
But yeah, I see you. I think the Midwest or Great Plains could do fine as an Independent country.
“Status is God”, amen
So too are khazar milkers
As a proper Jew (the beard, the hat...) I really enjoy your writing.
Not only are you right on most things, you are one of the few that offers any actionable steps that can improve the situation right now (Tortuga society), rather than endlessly bitching and wordcelling and waiting for things to magically turn around on day.
Even you grand vision of White Globalism is rooted in the system that already exist, and close to the 'normal' framework, and thus has some potential to work, unlike the dreams of secession and racial purity and mass expulsions.
If you even need Talmudic consultant (and can you really have a social revolution without it?), give me a call.
That Jewess is really hot.
Do you think she's done her IDF service? Makes her hotter in my book. 😂😂😂
Brilliant and beautifully expressed
Great read, thanks for responding, and what a bountiful number of potential topics for us to explore in your kindly-offered debate! I'll work with you to set something up that will be engaging for our audiences.
"To assume such a program entails “Brownification” is again to proceed instinctively from the scarcity mindset—why wouldn’t it mean bleaching?"
Because there are far more non-white people in the world, and America's gen alpha's already mostly non-white. Consequently, mass miscegenation results in everyone looking like Bruno Mars or Nyjah Houston, and white becomes a term to refer to an ever dwindling minority
Many of us don’t identify with Right or Left. I like peasants and hobbits. Most of us here are such whether some like to admit it openly or not. I want what is good and healthy for them without smothering those with more exceptional qualities or intelligence.
Total Walt victory
I thought Norm won (see comment on Norm's essay posted above). That we disagree on that is testament to the quality of the exchange.
It’s almost a case of “nobody’s wrong, you’re both right.” I think the main dividing line is a case of is/ought (Walt/Norm, respectively) or maybe a case of entryism and quotidian pragmatism (Walt) vs. adherence to principles to spur change through a paroxysm of action (Norm).
Spiritually and ideologically, I’d love to agree with Norm, but I think his approach is something to consider after things collapse.
Sorry, I'll have to disagree with the point about whites having a special penchant for creative brutality. This frankly seems like cope from the opposite direction — the way nerdy HBD-types like Sailer play up the trope of the "domesticated, civilized [subconsciously effete] white man" with appeal to low crime rates; the same way you and guys like BAP play up this angle of Aryan masculinist aggression. But neither is really true.
Yes Whites have indeed committed the greatest acts of organized violence in history ...as they also have the greatest humanitarian and internationalist acts (eradication of smallpox, abolition of slave trade, bringing modern medicine and Green Revolution innovations to Asia and Africa). That's simply a function of better industrial and technological capacities, of having begetted the industrial revolution and all of modernity — you're the first at everything. Indeed, when a non-Western power manages to master Western industry and science for their own ends we see comparably massive death tolls, like Imperial Japan's rampage through East and Southeast Asia: 25 million dead in just seven years. I won't even mention the Mongols, premodern at that (Maybe the Chinese are a bit more mercantile of course)
Even the unparalleled genocide of Native Americans - arguably the greatest conquest in history in terms of land gained, and conducted by a self-confident Europe during the spring of its virility, had more to do with the lack of immunity to Old World disease, rather than an excess of European brutality. When indigenous societies were only slightly more disease-resistant like the Maori, they managed to survive if diminished and relegated to minority status — and if anything these days we see a reversal of fortunes, seeing the haka performed as an anti-white humiliation ritual in New Zealand's parliament with absolute impunity, and to global (woke-media-consensus) approval.
And of course the rest of the Old World managed to survive as more-or-less civilizations with no substantial demographic replacement, although I'll grant that most are essentially failed states, and even the "BRICS" power-bloc isn't looking particularly vital. And while it's probable that America will successfully contain China[1], this will be done for the altar of Globalist Neoliberalism, _not_ Masculinist White Imperialism: the same such altar which also has white babies constantly suspended above the fiery pit of diversity and multiculturalism.
[1] Burst-Gorges-Dam scenarios are like to see America lose most of its major cities to Dongfengs too, especially since the Chinese of late have started to build up their nuclear arsenal in preparation for their Special Military Operation. (It wasn't always like this: China was diplomatically isolated for the entire 1960s and didn't have any missiles capable of reaching America or even Western Europe; and post-Split the Soviets might well have turned the other way if America wanted to do something a little pre-emptive. But adding to my thesis: of course it was Christian charity, not Aryan brutality, that in the end prevailed.)
My comment on Norm's essay: https://thenorme.substack.com/p/refuting-white-globalism/comment/85848036
If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle. -Sun Tzu
Therefore, a distilled version of the talmud is most efficacious.